TPT
Total:
$0.00

Kindergarten Critical Thinking Math Journal Prompts FREE Sample

Rated 5 out of 5, based on 12 reviews
5.0 (12 ratings)
2,859 Downloads
;
Miss Danielle Murphy
3.6k Followers
Grade Levels
PreK - K, Homeschool
Resource Type
Standards
Formats Included
  • PDF
Pages
7 pages
Miss Danielle Murphy
3.6k Followers

Description

This is a sample from my Mixed Up Molly Math Journal Prompts for kindergarten. Two of the prompts are from Part 1, and the last is from Part 2. These prompts are intended to provoke critical thinking and reasoning in students and work on several of the Standards of Mathematical Practice, but especially #3: construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

Molly is all mixed up and needs your help! Students must explain and justify their mathematical thinking in order to show Mixed Up Molly why she is incorrect in her thinking. This is excellent practice for being able to verbalize their reasoning and critique other's thinking--and since Molly is not real, no feelings are hurt! If you purchase the full set of prompts, several different versions of a 'Molly' are included for you to print so she can visit your classroom. Your students will LOVE helping her!!

These could be used in several ways: math journals, introducing new concepts, review, homework, math RTI groups, etc.!

Be sure to check out the full sets! Part 1:
Mixed Up Molly Math Journal Prompts


Part 2:
Mixed Up Molly Math Journal Prompts Part 2


I hope you enjoy this freebie! Please follow my store to receive updates and don't forget to leave feedback! Thanks so much!!
Total Pages
7 pages
Answer Key
N/A
Teaching Duration
N/A
Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines.

Standards

to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. Mathematically proficient students understand and use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously established results in constructing arguments. They make conjectures and build a logical progression of statements to explore the truth of their conjectures. They are able to analyze situations by breaking them into cases, and can recognize and use counterexamples. They justify their conclusions, communicate them to others, and respond to the arguments of others. They reason inductively about data, making plausible arguments that take into account the context from which the data arose. Mathematically proficient students are also able to compare the effectiveness of two plausible arguments, distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed, and-if there is a flaw in an argument-explain what it is. Elementary students can construct arguments using concrete referents such as objects, drawings, diagrams, and actions. Such arguments can make sense and be correct, even though they are not generalized or made formal until later grades. Later, students learn to determine domains to which an argument applies. Students at all grades can listen or read the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments.

Reviews

Questions & Answers

3.6k Followers