Force and Motion Grudgeball & Unfair Review Game Combo!
SchrakeUpScience
18 Followers
Grade Levels
6th - 8th
Subjects
Resource Type
Standards
CCSSRST.6-8.3
CCSSRST.6-8.4
CCSSRST.6-8.7
CCSSRST.6-8.10
NGSSMS-PS2-4
Formats Included
- Google Slides™
Pages
56 Slides
SchrakeUpScience
18 Followers
Made for Google Drive™
This resource can be used by students on Google Drive or Google Classroom. To access this resource, you’ll need to allow TPT to add it to your Google Drive. See our FAQ and Privacy Policy for more information.
Description
Do you need an easy to use, editable review game for Force and Motion? Then this is the resource for you! This game combo allows you to pick which game you want to engage students with. Grudgeball is a highly engaging, competitive review game where students use teamwork and skill to win the day. Alternatively, the unfair game is a prize based activity that keeps students on the edge of their seats.
This game based learning resource includes:
- 56 Prep Free Editable Game slides.
- Point and Click maneuverability on each question pair.
- 2 Games: Grudgeball & Unfair Game
- Editable Prizes
Total Pages
56 Slides
Answer Key
Included
Teaching Duration
45 minutes
Last updated 3 months ago
Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines.
Standards
to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
CCSSRST.6-8.3
Follow precisely a multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks.
CCSSRST.6-8.4
Determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context relevant to grades 6–8 texts and topics.
CCSSRST.6-8.7
Integrate quantitative or technical information expressed in words in a text with a version of that information expressed visually (e.g., in a flowchart, diagram, model, graph, or table).
CCSSRST.6-8.10
By the end of grade 8, read and comprehend science/technical texts in the grades 6–8 text complexity band independently and proficiently.
NGSSMS-PS2-4
Construct and present arguments using evidence to support the claim that gravitational interactions are attractive and depend on the masses of interacting objects. Examples of evidence for arguments could include data generated from simulations or digital tools; and charts displaying mass, strength of interaction, distance from the Sun, and orbital periods of objects within the solar system. Assessment does not include Newton’s Law of Gravitation or Kepler’s Laws.
Reviews
Questions & Answers
18 Followers
