Document Based Argumentative Writing Unit: Can Child Criminals Be Saved
Amy Tait
36 Followers
Grade Levels
9th - 12th
Resource Type
Standards
CCSSRI.9-10.1
CCSSRI.9-10.8
CCSSRI.11-12.1
CCSSRI.11-12.8
CCSSW.9-10.1
Formats Included
- PDF
Pages
26 pages
Amy Tait
36 Followers
Description
This is a high interest step-by-step unit for students using provided documents to write an argumentative paper about the idea of child criminals and the punishments/consequences they deserve. The unit includes answer key, teaching notes, planning organizers, and a rubric.
Total Pages
26 pages
Answer Key
Included
Teaching Duration
2 Weeks
Last updated Mar 26th, 2015
Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines.
Standards
to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
CCSSRI.9-10.1
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
CCSSRI.9-10.8
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
CCSSRI.11-12.1
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
CCSSRI.11-12.8
Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning (e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions and dissents) and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy (e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses).
CCSSW.9-10.1
Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
Reviews
Questions & Answers
36 Followers
