TPT
Total:
$0.00

3 week - Human Innovation Bracket activity (presentation and group discussion)

;
Mister Double Ewe
0 Followers
Grade Levels
8th - 12th
Resource Type
Standards
Formats Included
  • Google Drive™ folder
Pages
12 pages
$6.50
$6.50
Share this resource
Report this resource to TPT
Mister Double Ewe
0 Followers
Made for Google Drive™
This resource can be used by students on Google Drive or Google Classroom. To access this resource, you’ll need to allow TPT to add it to your Google Drive. See our FAQ and Privacy Policy for more information.

Description

Students will be assigned a human innovation that they will research and prepare a short persuasive presentation where they are to attempt to convince their peers that the Human Innovation they were assigned deserves the title of greatest human innovation of all time. As the class moves into the bracket they must work with others to expand their research and improve both their arguments and presentation methods.

The final round shifts to a face-off between two halves of the class where each team works in subgroups to prepare for an impassioned discussion that is meant to promote one innovation and weaken the other.

The activity and rubric focuses on research, citing sources, cooperation, public speaking, persuasion, critical thinking, and analysis.

Total Pages
12 pages
Answer Key
N/A
Teaching Duration
3 Weeks
Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines.

Standards

to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9–10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas.
Work with peers to set rules for collegial discussions and decision-making (e.g., informal consensus, taking votes on key issues, presentation of alternate views), clear goals and deadlines, and individual roles as needed.
Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that relate the current discussion to broader themes or larger ideas; actively incorporate others into the discussion; and clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions.
Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives, summarize points of agreement and disagreement, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views and understanding and make new connections in light of the evidence and reasoning presented.

Reviews

Questions & Answers

0 Followers