TPT
Total:
$0.00

Chasing Lincoln's Killer Informational Text Article of the Week

Rated 4.8 out of 5, based on 27 reviews
4.8 (27 ratings)
;
Mama Leone's ELA Emporium
132 Followers
Grade Levels
6th - 8th
Resource Type
Standards
Formats Included
  • Word Document File
Pages
6 pages
$2.00
$2.00
Share this resource
Report this resource to TPT
Mama Leone's ELA Emporium
132 Followers

What educators are saying

This resource helped my students understand the subject; they were engaged, and the work was easy for them to accomplish. Thank you!

Description

Based on Kelly Gallagher's Article of the Week concept, my reading articles are typically non-fiction and modeled on Vale Middle School's format. The articles have been chosen by me and all questions have been developed by me. If you would like to see what Vale Middle School does, check out http://vms.vale.k12.or.us/articles-week

This informational text was used in my classroom as an Article of the Week to go with the class reading of Chasing Lincoln's Killer. It is developed from the article "Could Modern Medicine Have Saved Lincoln?" By David Brown, Washington Post Staff Writer, Monday, May 21, 2007 and includes both multiple choice and short response questions. It is a 1170 lexile.
Total Pages
6 pages
Answer Key
N/A
Teaching Duration
45 minutes
Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines.

Standards

to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone, including analogies or allusions to other texts.
Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints.

Reviews

Questions & Answers